Here we have some interesting allegations. The alleged facts include the following, in brief (summarized by your author):
The governing documents of the Missouri Baptist Convention (MBC) provide that all charters for its agencies will include various provisions giving MBC retained control.
Windermere Baptist Conference Center, an agency of MBC, was formed in 2000. However, MBC alleges that MBC’s executive director, while acting in that capacity, arranged for charter amendments for the newly-formed agency that did not include provisions that could have been created to effect to the required retained control. (An interesting provision in the nonprofit corporation law, Mo. Stat. 355.606, allows articles to provide a third party with a veto any articles or bylaw amendment.) It is further alleged that the then executive director was not fully candid in communicating as to the circumstances.
The brief’s quite long. This is only a summary of a part of the pertinent allegations.
This particular claim was evidently disposed-of, against the plaintiffs, on the basis of the statute of limitations and a purported release. The alleged circumstances don’t sound so good. If the matter ultimately gets to a determination on the merits, it may provide some helpful guidance on pertinent Missouri principles.